Preamble
The purpose of this article is to combat lies and corruption in politics and support the notion of free and fair elections. This is not about Trump. It is about 75 million plus people who value their freedom, many of whom shower before and after work.
Not My President
Donald Trump was threatened with impeachment several times before he was even inaugurated as President on the 20th of January 2017. Welcome to the Whitehouse, Mr. President!
God only knows how many times he was threatened with impeachment since then. Here are a just a few. It was obvious that Trump has been a hated man ever since he commenced his Presidency. His supporters have claimed over the years that mainstream media (MSM), Democrats, Never Trumpers and even some establishment Republicans have vigorously overtly or covertly resisted his efforts to preside over the USA. Fake News reports, FBI spying on the Trump’s campaign and administration, the entire Russia Collusion hoax and sham Impeachment 1.0 were all cited by conservatives as evidence of bad faith actors. However, any hint of conspiracy or collusion among these antagonists was scoffed at by the MSM.
Following a year of big city riots, Big Tech censorship, and COVID-inspired election law changes, conservatives now believe that sufficient evidence of fraud exists, indicating that the 2020 election was systematically stolen from Trump. In response, the MSM, Democrats and even some Republicans have blamed Trump for inciting the January 6 Capitol riots through his speech, tweets and insistence that the 2020 election was stolen, resulting in Impeachment 2.0.
Saying the Quiet Part out Loud
A most amazing event occurred on the 4th of February when the Time Magazine decided to confess. To the chagrin of their media partners, Time could no longer contain their gloating. They just had to say the quiet part out loud.
Molly Ball wrote the article: “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election.” The author basically agreed with conservatives about much of the collusion and conspiracy, except that instead of stealing the election, their actions fortified the result in favour of Biden. In my honest opinion, the article was an arrogant attempt to distribute credit for a brilliantly-designed, dirty, yet hard-fought election win. Reading between the lines, the author signalled to nationalist populists that the US would never again allow the mistake that was the Donald Trump 45th US Presidency. The wishes of deplorable, gun-toting, freedom-lovers need to be nullified by their betters and that’s precisely what happened. She wrote:
“That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system’s fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.”
Orange Man Bad
The Times article was dropped just prior to the Senate (show)trial of the impeachment of citizen Donald J Trump, but for what reason, I cannot fathom. It almost begs a response from Trump in the well of the Senate, and it may serve as a tease, but I don’t know whether we’ll see it addressed. Every Democrat and even some Republicans have declared the term “Election Fraud” verboten and any attempt to refute the narrative: “Biden won fair and square” is being met with the full force of the establishment. We’ve even seen examples of a modern-day CCP Cultural Revolution “struggle sessions” attempting to force US Senators to concede on this very point.
The Big Lie vs the Big Steal
The New York Time has written several articles recently, claiming that Trump, like Hitler, told his supporters a “Big Lie” – that he actually won in a landslide and the election was stolen from him – and this caused the January 6 Capitol riot.
I don’t intend to discuss the Constitutionality of impeaching a non-sitting President or whether Donald Trump’s speech incited the Capitol rioters. These will, no doubt, be addressed by Trump’s lawyers during the Senate trial, with this short video unveiling some of the riot’s genuine architects. What I want to do in this article is to present some compelling, yet rarely seen, evidence of election fraud. I trust that for all who are willing to examine the evidence, there will be agreement that:
- the case for fraud is very strong;
- the election was far more plausibly “stolen” than “fortified;” and
- a full forensic audit of voting systems and ballot must be completed in order to restore faith in “free and fair” elections in the Western world.
The Receipts – Retail
The Navarro Report compiles hundreds of affidavits of illegal polling behaviours and thousands of documents indicating strong potential and outright evidence for fraud at the “retail” level.
As can be seen from his matrix Peter Navarro concentrates on traditional voter fraud mechanisms and shows the receipts – numbers of dead, under-age, out-of-state voters, late ballots, no chain of custody ballots etc. His analysis indicates that the votes in dispute far outnumber the “victory” margin.
The Receipts – Wholesale
There is sufficient evidence for election fraud at the “retail” level alone. However, “wholesale,” system-level election fraud is where the serious allegations have been levelled. Federal prosecutor Sidney Powell famously threatened to “release the Kraken” and Dominion Systems responded with a 1.3 B law suit. Powell has since dropped her cases. Crickets. Does this mean that there is no evidence of system-level election fraud? I think there may be some other forces at play.
On the 5th of February, Mike Lindell, owner of the US company, MyPillow, launched a 2-hour docu-movie titled “Absolute Proof” (watched over 100 M times so far across various platforms). Over the past few weeks, Dominion warned him about showing such evidence, but Mike would not back down. He even invited Dominion voting systems leaders to watch the video and respond. They are yet to file a law suit against Mike. From 12-24 min, Col. Phil Waldron (Ret US Army Cyber-Security Expert) summarises the findings of his cyber-security teams and then Mary Fanning (National Intelligence Researcher and Author) references the data collected by blxware and 3NET LABS programmers (from 1 hr 36-49 min mark).
Although not identical with the Waldron cyber teams’ findings, Fanning’s claims of significant foreign interference in the US 2020 Election are consistent with them and with those of Maria Zack’s Leonardo SpA hacking claims (later). Terry Turchie former Deputy Assistant Director of the Counter-Terrorism Division of the FBI (1 hr 53 min mark) believes that the Intelligence agencies (NSA, FBI, CIA etc.) were all likely compromised.
Col. Phil Waldron testified before the Arizona legislature on Dec 3rd 2020 regarding possible abnormalities in the November 3rd presidential election. At the 52 min mark of his presentation, Col. Waldron refers to his team of white hat hackers who captured evidence of foreign connections onto the Dominion Voting System network. Linked here is the affidavit of one anonymous white hat hacker.
This affidavit details several alarming findings:
- A public network scan of Dominionvoting.com on 2020-11-08 revealed 13 unencrypted passwords for dominion employees, and 75 hashed passwords available in TOR nodes.
- Server connections include Serbia, Iran and China.
- A search of the indivisible.org network showed a subdomain which evidences the existence of SCORECARD software in use as part of the Indivisible (formerly ACORN) political group for Obama.
- Patent assignments from Dominion to Chinese interests.
- A Decorator Process schematic describing the Scytl “data smoothing” feature.
The white hat hacker concludes their affidavit with: “In my professional opinion, this affidavit presents unambiguous evidence that Dominion Voter Systems and Edison Research have been accessible and were certainly compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China.”
“By using servers and employees connected with rogue actors and hostile foreign influences combined with numerous easily discoverable leaked credentials, these organizations neglectfully allowed foreign adversaries to access data and intentionally provided access to their infrastructure in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent one in 2020. This represents a complete failure of their duty to provide basic cyber security. This is not a technological issue, but rather a governance and basic security issue: if it is not corrected, future elections in the United States and beyond will not be secure and citizens will not have confidence in the results. I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed this November 23th, 2020.”
Mary Fanning broke a story in March 2017 about a former NSA/CIA contractor-turned whistleblower Dennis Montgomery. According to the article “Dennis Montgomery developed software programs that could breach secure computer systems and collect massive amounts of data. That system, THE HAMMER, according to the audio tapes, accessed the phone calls, emails and bank accounts of millions of ordinary Americans.” Montgomery claims that the government can plant files such as child pornography or state secrets on a target’s computer, setting up the owner of the device for blackmail or framed prosecution. The article includes several audio files and links to other experts who corroborate Montgomery’s claims. If you read my former article you may remember Lt. General (Ret.) Thomas McInerny discuss Hammer and Scorecard and how he believed it was used to steal the Nov 3rd 2020 election from Trump in several battleground states. More than two months have transpired since then and much more evidence is now available.
Back to Jovan Hutton Pulitzer. He is the inventor of the QR Code scanning technology, holding hundreds of patents. Pulitzer presented to the Georgia State Senate Sub-committee hearing on election integrity on Dec 30 2020. He proposed to use his expertise (free of charge) to determine which ballots were genuinely mailed (and folded), filled in by hand versus ballots that were printed, filled in by the printer and not mailed, but scanned as though they were.
Pulitzer claims to be able to determine, within a few hours, the number of legal ballots which should be included in the vote tally and those to be excluded in the whole state of Georgia. After the presentation, the Georgia Senate sub-committee attempted to conduct a full forensic audit of voting machines and ballots using Phil Waldron and Jovan Hutton Pulitzer. However, the audit was challenged and delayed in the State courts. Since that time, Democrat Senators replaced Republican Senators in Georgia and every Senate sub-committee member was replaced. A full forensic audit of voting machines and ballots is no longer a priority.
At the time of publishing this article, a similar Senate sub-committee in Maricopa County, Arizona was fighting through the courts to conduct a full forensic audit of voting machines and ballots using the services of Mr. Waldron and Mr. Pulitzer. The Maricopa County board of election supervisors is doing everything in their power to resist subpoenas and avoid handing over the election data. If the election was free and fair, why not hand over the data and prove it?
In a separate video, Pulitzer identifies a hacker from China, connected during the Georgia Senate run-off election (19 min mark).
Dominion claims that their machines are not connected to the internet during the election process. Hmmm.
Reverse-Engineering
The brilliant mathematician, Edward Solomon identified an inexplicable repetition of identical vote ratios (Trump to Biden) occurring several times consecutively in US voting precincts and then jumping to another precinct and doing the same.
He provides an irrefutable theory for how Biden made up significant votes between late Nov 3 and Nov 7 when he was declared the winner of the election. Solomon produced several videos for other states also as well as a simulation of the vote switching using the Starcraft video game.
Solomon showed that this type of manipulation was almost impossible via human agency alone at the local voting machine level. There had to be overall or systematic manipulation using an algorithm that supervised the ratio swapping from precinct to precinct at the appropriate time in several States concurrently. This, in turn, required the hacking of many voting systems from a central place or via a central algorithm for the US State in question. As has been shown, there were multiple hacks, but was there a central point of attack? This is as yet unknown, but it would definitely support Solomon’s theory.
All Roads Lead to Rome
On January 5th 2021 a story broke about the IT department head (Arturo D’Elia) of the Italian aerospace company – Leonardo SpA – who, under the instruction of US CIA agents in the US Embassy in Rome, hacked into the US voting system via a satellite, and uploaded an algorithm designed to shift votes from Trump to Biden. After listening to the initial audio file, I typed “Italy Did It” in google and ended up with nothing. I tried DuckDuckGo (which is now my default search engine) and found a treasure trove of information – and several articles debunking the story (as expected).
The non-profit group Nations In Action, headed up by Maria Zack, broke the “Italy Did It” story using the purpose-built web-site. Since the initial audio file (Jan 5), the site has continued to accumulate evidence with several affidavits and numerous video and audio interviews now captured. I’d suggest you grab a coffee and listen to / watch the 2 Feb Trumpet audio file and the 11 Feb video (begin at 15 min mark) as they are among the best / most comprehensive. There is a lot of info here. I have listened to or watched every one of Maria’s audio / video files and she has not slipped up with any of her facts. She is convinced of what she’s seen and heard and she, in turn, is very convincing.
It is alleged that Arturo D’Elia has copied the US Election data before and after the manipulation onto hard drives. He has agreed to supply this data once his and his family’s safety and security can be guaranteed. The weakest aspect of this story is that the current location and state of D’Elia is unknown. The evidence would also be more credible if D’Elia provided a personal affidavit or there was one from the US Army Intelligence officer who interviewed him, rather than that of the Italian lawyer who investigated this. Otherwise, this story is compelling and difficult to rebut.
The Italian Job or ItalyGate as it is also known by, is not essential for the entire Election Fraud story to be proven true, but it sure would help to accelerate the process. In fact, D’Elia’s before-and-after election data image would be the key that picks the lock for
“the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organisation in the history of American politics.“
Joe Biden
The other important point to note about the Italy Did It story is Maria Zack’s allegation of evidence linking former President Obama to the entire scheme via a multi-million dollar cash payment to former Italian President Renzi. The money trail would be essential to bringing criminal convictions to bear – if the story could be proven true.
I’d like to finish this section on a fun fact. Maria claims that Col. Timothy Matlack, the hand that penned the Declaration of Independence, is her great, great, great, great, great grandfather. Perhaps that’s why she’s such a honey-badger!
Lacking Intelligence
If we were to re-examine the Times article, we would see that credit for the Biden election “fortification” was spread among many organisations. However, one group was conspicuous by its absence. When Trump criticised U.S. intelligence agencies, Senator Chuck Schumer warned: “Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.” So, when I state that the Times article is lacking Intelligence, I’m sure you get the pun.
This is actually serious. There are many things about the US 2020 Election that just don’t make any sense. The CIA would not provide evidence of foreign election interference as required by Trump’s Executive Order. That’s called obstruction and insubordination.
The FBI and DOJ sat on Hunter Biden’s laptop since late 2019 and only reported that he was under investigation following the election. Why?
Republican election board supervisors, State Governors and State Legislatures in battleground states all agreed to certify electors quickly and easily, despite numerous court cases being filed. Why would they be so keen to hand over power to Democrats? None of the judges wanted to hear a case? Why? Republican Bush appointee Chief Justice John Roberts sided with left leaning justices on the Supreme Court for several years now. Why? It would seem that many people in important decision-making positions were acting out of fear or were in some way compromised (blackmailed?). Could the HAMMER have been used?
In a previous article, I wrote about Executive Order 13848. It was to grant extraordinary powers to the President. It was to be triggered by a report from the Director of National Intelligence into foreign interference into the US election and was due by Dec 18 2020. The report was delayed due to the CIA’s defiance of Trump. Times Magazine wrote about an expectation on the left of Trump declaring martial law and their readiness to mobilise large numbers of activists. As we know, this never occurred. Trump did not want a civil war.
By the Numbers
Is there sufficient evidence to make the case for Election Fraud more plausibly true than false? In my honest opinion, the answer is a resounding “Yes” based on the following summary of key elements:
It’s easy to debunk and lie if there are no consequences. However,
“for a signal to be honest, it has to be costly or handicapping.”
Gad Saad, evolutionary psychologist and author of “The Parasitic Mind.”
None of the sources in the table above will gain anything by publishing their findings. Rather, they will face threats, besmirching, cancellation or worse. Maria Zack reports that Arturo D’Elia told his wife about the Leonardo hack after his conscience would not let him rest and that’s how ItalyGate started. Do you think his life is now safe, having implicated the CIA (and Obama) in, allegedly, the greatest heist of the century?
A final point on the these Aspects of Election Fraud. They are independent, yet form a coherent story. If any one aspect proves to be false, none of the others are discredited.
I will Fear no Evil
I have been watching the Stephen King series “The Stand.” It has a classic good versus evil plot set in a post-pandemic world where 99 % of the world’s citizens have died. Randall Flagg, the embodiment of evil, levitates to display his power over the people.
However, during the 8th episode, in a show trial where three of Flagg’s enemies are committed to death, cracks begin to appear.
Chained in a pool, about to be drowned for his dissent, Larry Underwood – instead of being beaten into submission – shouts “I will fear no evil.”
Shortly after that, two voices from within Randall Flagg’s cohort, follow in Larry’s footsteps and repeat the sentence “I will fear no evil.” The tyrant’s power is lost when people see him for who he is.
A powerful being appears, destroying Flagg with lightning bolts and all of his followers with the nuclear device intended for Flagg’s enemies. In a way, The Stand appears to be mimicking US politics. I’m not wishing for a kinetic civil war. However, in the end, if freedom-lovers continue to demand truth and transparency and never concede to lies and threats from the corrupt establishment, the tyrant power-base, built on fear, will begin to crumble. Every ruler will be judged by a higher power, whether in this life or the next.
Throughout Impeachment 2.0, the cabal of Democrats, establishment Republicans, Big Tech, MSM and the Intelligence Community appeared to be holding freedom-lovers in an illegal choke-hold and then saying “if you don’t concede that the Election was won fair and square by Biden, we’ll brand you as a domestic terrorist and snuff you out.” Watch Democratic Senator Ted Lieu in this video say this other quiet part out loud (27:20 – 30:00 min mark). The National Guard has been deployed in Washington DC since before January 20th, with razor wire, as if this was Beijing. The reason for this continuing occupation is intended to force Donald Trump to say the magic words: “Biden won fair and square.” Don’t hold your breath.
Donald Trump was acquitted of Impeachment and is free to run for office again.
What should lovers of freedom and democracy do now?
Activate your inner honey-badger.
Gad Saad
It’s time to stand up and to do what’s right and true.
