Month: January 2022

A very large group of small dollar funders pooled their money and elected a Project Management Team (PMT) to run a critical project affecting their entire membership.  The PMT assured the funders that the project would be run effectively.

However, the initial problem was poorly defined from the get-go; a common problem with projects.  Not only did the PMT mis-diagnose the problem; they also missed the mark with outcomes.  Critical project measures and success criteria did not align with the outcomes desired by funders and initially promised by the PMT.

The solution provider selected by the PMT had a history of significant criminal conduct with Billions of dollars of settlement claims.  This did not seem to be a problem with the PMT, as they signed contracts with the solution provider that granted them immunity from liability.

Although not disclosed until much later, the sole-source solution provider had a solution developed before the problem was identified.  This time paradox could only mean that they knew of the problem before it was even identified.  The solution designed by the provider had not been used before in this manner, but they were very confident that it would work.  As a result of this confidence level and an aggressive timetable established by the PMT, early-stage trials were compressed and normal risk assessment process steps excluded.  Subject Matter Expertise was specifically rejected.

The PMT failed to hold the service provider accountable when it was found that trial data was falsified in an attempt to gain approval to move to staged implementation.  An independent auditor failed in their duty to assure of data quality, but this did not seem to concern the PMT who was keen to report positive progress against the project schedule.

Once the project commenced implementation, expected outcomes were not being achieved, but this was not reported to the funding group.  Instead, success criteria were changed, often without communication.  Key terms and success criteria were often re-defined in an attempt to deliver what appeared to be an acceptable outcome.

A group of concerned funders appealed to the PMT, pointing out the apparent problems with the project solution and implementation plan.  The PMT initially attempted to placate the group with lies and misrepresentations.  When they became troublesome, the PMT refused to listen to this group of naysayers and eventually began reporting that the projects’ problems were in fact caused by this group.

Although undisclosed initially, the solution provider and PMT had private early discussions regarding this likelihood.  When project success relied on these changes, the PMT did not challenge the solution provider.  In their rush to achieve project milestones, new risk assessments for such changes seemed to be disregarded.  The performance measures of both parties now relied on these late-stage changes, so any questions from the naysayers were quickly being dismissed as unhelpful; even disruptive.

The solution provider had already made huge profits on what appeared to be a failed project.  Rather than using the profit to fix the problems, they funded data collection and reporting efforts that assisted them to continue portraying projecting success, while the outcomes were clearly troublesome.

The group of concerned funders was now under attack – not just by the solution provider, but also by the PMT.  Laws were even being passed to silence and destroy the livelihoods of this group, which was only trying to point out the fact that the project had failed.

Yes, the PMT finally agreed that the project had failed.  However, following this admission, the group of funders were told that additional money would be needed to design an even more ambitious solution.  In the interim, the PMT determined that, despite the failure of the current solution, it would continue to be implemented.  In fact, the implementation plan would be rolled-out in an even more aggressive manner.

Guess

In case you didn’t guess it, that is the story of the coordinated COVID-19 response orchestrated by Bill Gates, Tony Fauci and the global medical industrial complex.  Their solution to COVID-19 and indeed, every possible future disease is and has been for well over a decade: universal vaccination.

The initial promise of vaccination was:
1. personal protection from infection with COVID-19. When this failed to materialise, the outcome shifted to:

2. a reduction in the spread of infection. When this failed, the outcome shifted to:

3. a reduction in the likelihood of serious health outcomes and death from COVID-19 infection. When this failed, the outcome shifted to the final line of defence:

4. the protection of the crumbling COVID-19 testing and hospital system.

The media have been trying very hard to blame ongoing death and hospitalisation on “the Pandemic of the Unvaccinated.”  However, this argument has been totally exposed as a cruel joke by the Omicron variant.  This past two years should be referred to as the “Pandemic of the Untreated.”

For those interested, a great podcast on this topic is available here.

Mass Formation Psychosis

Unfortunately, at this point, there are likely 30% of people out there who have ceased reading this article by now.  They are already suffering from mass formation psychosis (Professor Dr. Mattias Desmet) and cannot be rescued by logic or reason.

Therefore, the remainder of this article is targeted at the following groups of people:

• The 40% in the middle, who are persuadable with evidence; and
• The 30% who are already fighting the official narrative.

With all of the fear porn being distributed by the MSM, the number of COVID infections, hospitalisations and deaths is no longer being reported for “vaccinated” versus “unvaccinated” or “of COVID” versus “with COVID.”  That is, of course, unless the numbers du jour support the “universal vaccination” position.

One month ago, when the borders were re-opened, there were < 4,000 COVID cases across Australia.  At the time of writing there were almost 1.8 M.  Where did they all come from?

• Do you realise that the only people allowed to cross borders are fully vaccinated?
• Do you realise that the only people allowed to interact in society are fully vaccinated?
• Despite this, have you noticed that the unvaccinated are being blamed for the (obviously) failing health care systems of some of world’s most modern countries?  Is that really the root cause?

Sleight of Hand

The Pledge:         Therapeutics don’t work; vaccines are the only way to escape COVID isolation.

The Turn:             Well, vaccines don’t actually stop COVID; you still need to isolate and wear masks.

The Prestige:      (The lack of) COVID-19 vaccination is the cause of significant death and disease.

Whether by design or by accident, the types of death and disease arising from SARS-COV-2 infection appear very similar to that brought about by the COVID-19 inoculations.  Let’s examine this further.

And here is an excerpt from one of Dr. Malone’s recent articles:

“Clearly, Google was not the only corporation triggered by Joe Rogan podcast # 1757 which previously reached #1 podcast ranking worldwide, has been referred to as “the most important interview of our time” and has been seen by over 50 million viewers.  But what absolutely has been generated by all of the co-opted reactionary press and Big Tech titans metaphorically tripping over their shoelaces is a massive trove of real time data validating the brilliant Mass Formation intellectual synthesis developed by Professor Desmet over the last two years.

In this coordinated propaganda and censorship response, we can clearly see the hands of the BBC-led Trusted News Initiative [global media collusion to eliminate vaccine hesitancy], the Scientific Technological Elite, the transnational investment funds and their World Economic Forum allies which control Pfizer and most of Big Pharma, Legacy Media and Big Tech (and many national governments) acting in real time to suppress a growing awareness by the general public of having been actively manipulated using crowd psychology tools to generate clinically significant fear and anxiety of COVID-19 (otherwise known as “Coronaphobia”) to advance their agendas on a global scale.”

During that June 21, 2021 podcast, Dr. Robert Malone made some very disturbing claims about the COVID-19 “vaccines” that caused him to become one of the media’s key targets.

The Darkhorse group analysed the Japanese study proving that the spike protein generated by mRNA DID NOT remain near the injection site, but rather, circulated within the blood stream and settled in various organs including the ovaries, bone marrow and thyroid system.

“According to Malone, the FDA knew the COVID spike protein was biologically active and could travel from the injection site and cause adverse events, and that the spike protein, if biologically active, is very dangerous. In fact, Malone was one of many scientists to warn the FDA about the dangers of the free spike protein.”

Since that time (seven months ago at the time of writing), Malone has become a key figure in this epic battle of COVID ideas.  He was ridiculed for claiming that the inoculation-induced spike could be just as toxic as the wild spike.  The evidence cited throughout this article has exposed the truth and vindicates his position.

The Prestige – explained

Many first-world hospitals are indeed, under pressure, but is this new?  You’ve no doubt seen the Ambulance “ramping” out of control at many of Australia’s hospitals and have heard the horror stories of people waiting for hours following Emergency 000 calls. 

It is true that some people in ICU are there because of COVID-19 complications (especially with Delta), but what is the distribution of causes for those currently hospitalised?  What does that Pareto Chart look like?  The truth of this is being withheld.  Media strongly imply that it’s all due to COVID-19 infection, but the following set of facts challenges this premise.

The Prestige – Hypothesis

COVID-19 vaccination is the cause of significant death and disease.

The remainder of this articles outlines some key sources of evidence in support of this hypothesis.

As explained in previous articles, the VAERS and similar vaccine adverse effects databases contain only a fraction of the total number.  The medical industrial complex owns these systems and the reporting of adverse effects.  They have created incentives to suppress the collection of such data.

Blow them Whistles!

In a previous article, I covered the story of a nurse in Adelaide who was fighting for her job.  For over 18 months she, like so many brave individuals, worked on the front-lines to care for COVID patients.  She and all of her colleagues were lauded as heroes.  Then they were all cast upon the scrap-heap when they refused to take the experimental gene therapy.  Why would they choose to do that?  At the 1 min mark she reports that in one of the local hospitals, 30 of the 38 patients in ICU were vaccinated.

From a November 2021 report: “It’s Hard to Watch:” Hospital ERs Across The Nation [USA} Are Completely Overwhelmed With Non-Covid Patients “Sicker Than They Have Ever Seen.” 

“It’s Hard to Watch:” Hospital ERs Across The Nation Are Completely Overwhelmed With Non-Covid Patients “Sicker Than They Have Ever Seen” – Nurses Forced to Give Treatments in Hallways Because No Beds are Available

“With fewer people catching the virus, you should reasonably expect hospitals to see a decline in ER visits, but, somehow, the opposite is happening. Throughout the country, even in places that are not considered ‘Covid hotspots,’ emergency rooms are absolutely overrun with seriously ill patients, forcing hospital staff – in many cases – to provide care in the hallway because every bed is already occupied.

The sharp uptick has mainly been driven by much more severe illnesses and conditions than Covid. In fact, the bulk of the ER visits have been to treat things like abdominal pain, respiratory problems, blood clots, and HEART CONDITIONS –  suicide attempts are also way up.”

Nurses and paramedics see a lot of things first-hand that are not being reported on the MSM.  They seem to be more willing that doctors to speak up.  Here is a compilation of whistle-blower nurses and first-responders with similar stories.  They all say that COVID-19 inoculations are causing death and disease and it’s not being reported.

Leading Indicators

In an earlier article, I wrote about a cohort of people who had been tested by the PULS method and showed a doubling of their risk of heart attack following their inoculation with mRNA products.  This report was removed from the AHA journal following criticism, but the abstract remains.

Numerous fact-checkers have attempted to debunk claims like these above stating that the connection between death and the vaccine is unproven.

That is a valid concern.  Correlation does not equal causation.  HOWEVER, it’s up to the vaccine developer to PROVE that the product is safe.  This was not done and people are dying with conditions identified as potential side effects.  The burden of proof should be on Big Pharma, but the FDA did not do their job.

Without an autopsy it’s very difficult to make a definitive connection between vaccination and death.  What is troubling, however, is the sheer volume of anecdotes that have been assembled into a clear fact pattern.

Super-healthy sub-groups

• A 500% increase in deaths among FIFA soccer players (a specific sub-group with meticulous records)
• 85% increase in US pilot deaths.
• Tennis stars.

If he was infected in December 2021, he now has natural immunity > 20 times strong than that provided by ANY inoculation.  He is standing at the brink of becoming the greatest tennis player of all time.  He needs one more slam to equal Roger and Rafa and with several more years left in his career, he’s likely to exceed that.  Why would he want to risk tennis greatness with an experimental gene therapy that is neither safe, nor effective?  Just ask former Top 25 Frenchman, Jeremy Chardy for his views on this.

Causation versus Correlation

The CDC claims that “a review of available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records, has not established a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines.”

These claims are coming under intense pressure.  I don’t know for how much longer they can keep lying to the public.

Follow the Money

The CEO of an Indiana (USA) insurance company identified a 40% increase in death claims in the last two quarters compared to previous years.  These are not COVID deaths and the rise is unprecedented in the industry.  The claimants are fully vaccinated employees who don’t normally die at this age.  Alarm bells have gone off because it directly affects profitability.

Excess deaths in the UK

Alex Berenson wrote an unbelievable article titled: Vaccinated English adults under 60 are dying at twice the rate of unvaccinated people the same age “and have been for six months.  This chart may seem unbelievable or impossible, but it’s correct, based on weekly data from the British government.”

Here’s an excerpt from Berenson’ article:

“I have checked the underlying dataset myself and this graph is correct.  Vaccinated people under 60 are twice as likely to die as unvaccinated people.  And overall deaths in Britain are running well above normal.”

Autopsies

German Chief Pathologist Peter Schirmacher conducted 40 autopsies recently and raised significant concerns.  His findings were disputed by the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, the German federal medical regulatory body and research institution for vaccines and biomedicines.

Schirmacher, the director of the Pathological Institute of the University of Heidelberg, reported that in the forty autopsies he recently conducted, the most common denominator among them was that they died within two weeks of receiving a dose of COVID-19 vaccine.

Apart from stressing that the vaccine seemed to have spurred the development of autoimmune diseases as a side effect, the Chief Pathologist also discovered that it also caused cerebral vein thrombosis in some of the deceased persons he examined.

Based on the results of his investigation, Schirmacher is calling for more frequent and more thorough autopsies of vaccinated individuals to determine if the COVID-19 shots played a role in their demise. The Chief Pathologist emphasized that he is publicizing his findings because there may already be many unreported cases of deaths resulting from the COVID-19 vaccine.”

I don’t trust people; they tend to lie.  Evidence never lies.

(Gil Grissom – CSI)

Autopsies of Autopsies

Let’s move onto two other doctors: Sucharit Bhakdi, MD and Arne Burkhardt, MD who conducted autopsies of 15 individuals that were initially found to have died without any connection to them taking a vaccine.

In their summary report, they wrote:

“A natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus) will in most individuals remain localized to the respiratory tract.  In contrast, the vaccines cause cells deep inside our body to express the viral spike protein, which they were never meant to do by nature.  Any cell which expresses this foreign antigen will come under attack by the immune system, which will involve both IgG antibodies and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes.  This may occur in any organ.  We are seeing now that the heart is affected in many young people, leading to myocarditis or even sudden cardiac arrest and death.  How and why such tragedies might causally be linked to vaccination has remained a matter of conjecture because scientific evidence has been lacking. This situation has now been rectified.

Histopathologic analyses have been performed on the organs of 15 persons who died after vaccination.  The initially performed conventional post-mortems also uncovered no obvious hints to a possible role of vaccination, since the macroscopic appearance of the organs was overall unremarkable.

In most cases, ‘rhythmogenic heart failure’ was postulated as the cause of death.  But our subsequent histopathological analyses then brought about a complete turnaround.”

They concluded their findings with:

“Histopathologic analysis show clear evidence of vaccine-induced autoimmune-like pathology in multiple organs.  That myriad adverse events deriving from such auto-attack processes must be expected to very frequently occur in all individuals, particularly following booster injections, is self-evident.

Beyond any doubt, injection of gene-based COVID-19 vaccines places lives under threat of illness and death.  We note that both mRNA and vector-based vaccines are represented among these cases, as are all four major manufacturers.”

In case you know a coroner, here are some notes and recommendations for conducting post-mortem examination of persons deceased in connection with COVID vaccination from Dr. Prof. A. Burkhardt.

I can only assume that their paper was not peer-reviewed because they believed it would not be accepted.  Instead, it accompanied a presentation to the Doctors for COVID Ethics symposium that was live-streamed by UKColumn on December 10th, 2021.

In a related Steve Kirsch article, we read the reaction to these two doctors from a level-headed scientist:

“If the autopsy findings are confirmed by other pathologists with additional samples, and if they are combined with the findings of Dr. Hoffe (>60% inoculant recipients have elevated D-dimer tests and evidence of clotting) and Dr. Cole (increase in cancers after inoculation, including twenty-fold increase in uterine cancer), we are seeing a disaster of unimaginable proportions.  The conclusion (if supported by further data) is that essentially EVERY inoculant recipient suffers damage, with more damage after each shot.  Given the seriousness of the types of damage (autoimmune diseases, cancer, re-emergent dormant infections, clotting/strokes, cardiac damage, etc.), these effects will translate into lifespan reduction, which should be counted as deaths from the inoculations.  So, in the USA, where ~200M people have been fully inoculated, the number of deaths will not be the 10,000 or so reported in VAERS, or the 150,000+ scaled-up deaths from VAERS, but could be closer to tens of millions when the inoculation effects play out!

The question in my mind is whether it is possible to reverse these inoculation-based adverse events.  Can the innate immune system be fully restored?  Can the micro clotting be reversed?  Can the autoimmunity be reversed?  I have seen a wide spectrum of opinions on whether this is possible, none of which is overly convincing.

Are we headed for the situation where the ~30% unvaxxed will be devoting their lives to operating whatever is left of the economic infrastructure and serving as caretakers for the vaxxed?

I realize the above sounds extreme, and maybe when more data are gathered from myriad credible sources the results and conclusions may change, but right now the above data seem to synchronize with the demonstrated underlying mechanisms of damage.  Additionally, we seem to be doubling down on inoculations, with fourth booster being proposed for Israel, and UK suggesting quarterly boosters.”

Immune System Warning – European Regulators

European Union regulators warned that frequent Covid-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible.

Vaccine efficacy has been shown to fail in less than three months.  The FDA and TGA are moving to mandate boosters at a high frequency to retain “fully vaccinated” status.

Global Big Data study of COVID Vaccine Impact

Almost 90% of all countries studied have seen an increase in cases and deaths.

“Instead of bringing an end to this pandemic as promised, the widespread rollout of the experimental vaccines has actually caused a sharp increase in Covid-19 cases and deaths across the world, according to a recently published preprint study that looked at data from the 145 of the most vaccinated countries in the world.   Almost 90% of all countries studied have seen an increase in cases and deaths.

“The statistically significant and overwhelmingly positive causal impact after vaccine deployment on the dependent variables total deaths and total cases per million should be highly worrisome for policy makers.  They indicate a marked increase in both COVID-19 related cases and death due directly to a vaccine deployment that was originally sold to the public as the ‘key to gain back our freedoms.’  The effect of vaccines on total cases per million and its low positive association with total vaccinations per hundred signifies a limited impact of vaccines on lowering COVID-19 associated cases.

These results should encourage local policy makers to make policy decisions based on data, not narrative, and based on local conditions, not global or national mandates. These results should also encourage policy makers to begin looking for other avenues out of the pandemic aside from mass vaccination campaigns.”

Deadly Games

As bad as that is, check this out:  This site: How Bad is My Batch? is developed by Craig Paardekooper and that simply analyses adverse effects data from the VAERS database.   It identifies the worst batches in terms of death and disease.

The graph below is the outcome of a damning analysis by independent researchers in Sweden. The vertical axis is number of adverse effects. Notice how the number of these reduces each month for each batch.

The author describes these results as “devastating.” He says that they indicate a steady reduction in product toxicity each month for each batch.

Pfizer is conducting a dosage study on a monthly basis in Sweden.

Inflexion Point

At what point do individuals (both Vaxxed and not) stand up to tyranny and shout “STOP!”  If the Unvaxxed are eliminated, the Vaxxed will lose their control group.  When death and disease increase, there will be no ability to argue whether it is unusual.

As Jesus carried his cross to Golgotha, he warned the women lamenting this event:

“Daughters of Jerusalem, do not weep for me, but weep for yourselves and for your children….For if they do this when the wood is green, what will happen when it is dry?”

Jesus of Nazareth circa 30 AD (from Luke’s Gospel, Ch 23)