A recent story on legacy media appeared, titled:
Virus vaccine contract review ordered.
“Australia’s pharmaceutical contracts will be reviewed to ensure the nation is well placed to deal with emerging COVID-19 variants.”
“The government wants the review conducted as a matter of urgency to respond to emerging variants and give Australians access to the best health measures, Health Minister Mark Butler says.
‘I make no judgment about the existing contracts. I have no reason to think that they’re not appropriate,’ Mr Butler told reporters in Canberra on Thursday.
‘But this is a fast-moving landscape. We need to make sure that we are agile … to ensure that arrangements that might have been fantastic three months ago are fit for purpose for the rest of this year and into next year.’
On June 30th, Australia’s Health Minister called for an urgent review of contracts with COVID shot manufacturers, although he has “no reason to think that they’re not appropriate.”
What could have happened to move from “no reason” to “urgent review”?
On June 28th, the US FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) approved a bivalent COVID-19 shot with the Wuhan strain and the Omicron variant. To this point, all COVID shots have targeted either the original Wuhan strain or the next. At first blush, the decision to now target the Omicron BA.4 / BA.5 strain is obvious. After all, blind Freddie can see that the current COVID shots offer virtually no protection against Omicron.
However, is an escalating Vaxx vs COVID arms race a smart move?
In early 2021, world-leading scientists and vaccinologists like Dr. Luc Montagnier, Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche all warned about the folly of mass vaccination in the midst of a pandemic. They all advocated for early treatment using cheap, safe and effective repurposed drugs (which were all banned in the Western World). Coronavirus strains mutate way too quickly to allow drug companies to develop and test new vaccine products. By the time they come to market, the virus has mutated several times, making the vaccine leaky. That’s why there has never been an effective flu jab.
Can you believe that 2019 Wuhan strain COVID boosters are STILL being offered TODAY against the now dominant Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 strains. This article (dated July 7th) states:
If your doctored offered you the 2019 flu shot would you take it? After catching COVID would you take it a second or even a third time? Now the Government wants you to have a fourth round!
Upon what do you think is the Australian Government basing this enormous level of confidence in a fourth COVID shot?
Could it be: the “great protection” the first three shots have given the Australian public in terms of infection, hospitalisation and death?
I’ve written much about vaccine-related injury and death in previous articles. Here is a new statistic for you to consider. For the past five years, the number of Americans registered with a permanent disability averaged approx. 30 M. It varied little between 2016 and 2020. Since the vaccine roll-out began, the figure rose steadily and now approaches 33 M, almost 10 % more in the past 18 months.
The way that the FDA VRBPAC intends to win the Vaxx vs COVID arms race is to skip testing.
With their new “Future Framework” the committee has decided that “similar” biological products no longer need testing. Simple.
Lab to jab.
On June 28th, the FDA VRBPAC voted: 19 yes and 2 no to adding Omicron to the shots and skipping the testing phase.
From the Toby Rogers’ article:
“At the meeting, the manufacturers (Moderna, Pfizer, and Novavax) were asked what their production timelines are… and they said out loud,
‘So long as we don’t have to provide any clinical data, we’ll have them ready by fall.’
VRBPAC
No one had a problem with that.”
Well, there you have it. “Science” has now evolved to the point where the Medical Industrial Complex – Big Pharma, the regulator (FDA) and the Government agencies (CDC, NIH etc.) have collectively decided to ignore all testing prior to jabbing Billions of people world-wide. Happy Days.
“Just trust us”
they demand.
There’s one thing that still puzzles me. How can the medical establishment continue to claim that there is no evidence of harm from the COVID shots?
In response to a Freedom of Information Request submitted by Children’s Health Defense, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last week admitted “it never analyzed the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System for safety signals for COVID-19 vaccines.”
That makes sense.
If you’re not looking for safety signals, you won’t find any.
I presume they will be trying for a “plausible deniability” defence at Nuremburg 2.0.
By the way, a very strange thing happened in Austria recently.
“In Austria the massive harm done to human life and health done by the Covid “vaccines” has resulted in the Austrian Minister of Health shifting responsibility to doctors who betrayed their medical responsibility to inform patients of the risks of the vaccine.”
Hmmm. It looks like the dam is breaking.
But we still haven’t answered the question: “what is the basis for this extraordinary level of confidence in a medical establishment that got everything wrong regarding COVID response?”
Do you remember Dr. Deborah Birx who, alongside Tony Fauci, directed COVID response in the US and by default, throughout the world, beginning with “two weeks to flatten the curve?”
Dr Birx was questioned recently by US Congressman Jim Jordan. I’d recommend you watch the video embedded in this link, but I’ve also provided some of the transcript below:
“When public health officials and agencies stridently told America that the COVID vaccines would be a ‘dead end for the virus’ and stop infection and spread, upon what did they base that claim and how did they get it so wrong? Was the government lying when they said this?”
Jim Jordan
“I don’t know. I was not part of the taskforce discussions.” Dr. Birx
“When the government told us the vaccinated could not transmit it [COVID], was that a lie or a guess?
Jim Jordan
“I think it was hope.”
Dr. Deborah Birx
“I’m just struck with the irony. We’ve got government agencies guessing, hoping, or lying with the information they’re presenting to the American people and this is the same administration that wants to set up the disinformation governance board and want to talk about misinformation. They are the biggest purveyor of misinformation, false information, hopeful information, but not accurate and true information…”
Jim Jordan
There you have it, folks. They are basing their trust in hope.
If you took the COVID shot, you were sold a bottle of Hopium.
Hope is a human expectation for a good future outcome. One would normally only hope in a person who or institution which has proven itself to be trust-worthy, based on a long history of correct decisions and beneficial actions. In an earlier article titled “Trust” I showed how the new “Science”, rather than proving itself to be trust-worthy, has caused unimaginable death and loss to society.
In March 2022, I wrote about how Governments and Institutional leaders have exhibited: Mistakes; Recklessness; Lies; Hubris; Callousness; Cowardice and Greed.
I’d like to add one more:
Confusion.
I know that many were forced to take the shot to keep working or were guilted into it by relatives. There were also some who did the risk assessment and decided that the shot was good for them. I’m all for medical autonomy. If you want to keep taking the experimental gene therapy, soon to be administered from Lab to Jab with no testing – that’s totally up to you.
However, if you have buyer’s remorse and are feeling a little hopeless at the moment, please consider the following:
