Digital Totalitarianism: Totalitarianism enabled with digital technology.
Firstly, establish and then maintain population levels and resource consumption in line with Earth’s perceived carrying capacity.
These are the two goals of Sustainability as defined by the United Nations. I’ll not speculate as to how the first goal will be achieved in this article. Rather, I’ll focus on how Sustainability will be maintained, informed by the UN Agenda 2030, the World Economic Forum and Brzezinski’s / Kissinger’s vision of human control.
“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.”
Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era (1970).
“Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world”
National Security Study Memorandum 200 (1974)
Many plans for global socio-cultural, geographical and economic control are already being deployed.
Information
- Multi-Billion dollar “dis-information” campaigns are being waged to control the information milieu, crushing dissident voices.
- Complicit religious leaders are appealing to the “blind faith” of low-information parishioners (a future article) to “obey their government.”
- Youth are being enticed to live in virtual reality – the digital equivalent of Marx’s “opiate of the masses” (see PG).
Food
- Food production and processing is being violently assaulted under the pretext of “climate change” (see Holod Games).
Energy
- The elimination of private vehicles and fossil fuels (a future article) will be used to herd people into 15-minute smart cities (a future article) that that will act as virtual prisons.
- Access to capital for fossil fuel industries is being choked-off by ESG scores and complicit business board members (a future article).
Who Controls Money Controls the World
The current world population is simply too large for totalitarian rulers to use physical restraints on dissidents. Therefore, natural compliance is sought to keep the majority of people at ease during the transition. Rather than being forced, people are being strongly encouraged to “Opt-in” and over time, to accept tyranny.
How will this be accomplished?
If you said “via digital control” then go to the front of class!
Actually, not that kind of digital control;
a more modern version.
It’s taken some time, but the goal of eliminating cash is now progressing rapidly.
Just look how far we’ve come (much of it thanks to COVID restrictions).
There are only a few more steps to lock in digital financial totalitarianism.
But before we go there, let’s recall what we’ve all just lived through.
The Green COVID Tick was used to segregate one class of people from another.
In the same way that German Jews who were branded with a yellow star, without their Green Pass, the unvaxxed lost access to many places and services.
This is despite the fact that natural immunity is far superior to that that obtained from COVID shots (see the Cleveland study in Holod Games.)
Despite growing scepticism about the safety and efficacy of the COVID jabs, G20 leaders agreed to make COVID vaccination a pre-requisite for international travel. Science has been ejected from the discussion. Vaccine status (not just for COVID) will become a key part of a person’s digital identity.
Digital Identity
Above, we find a lovely cartoon ad from the Federal Government (2021) about Digital Identity. And below is a more recent ad using Channel Seven news as their surrogate.
Do you notice how digital identity is being sold as a convenience and a protection from cyber threats?
Did you also know that the ATO is fining anyone who runs a business $1M if they don’t get their Digital Identity?
Wow! How is that justified? But Aussie businesses are just the beginning. The ATO wants every Aussie to go digital.
Here is a recent article by Michelle Falstein of the NSW Council for Civil Liberties entitled: “Australia Card Mark II: NSWCCL’s Michelle Falstein on Labor’s Proposed Digital Identity System.” In it she discusses new legislation that will likely garner bi-partisan support from the two major parties. Citizens need to see through the political rhetoric and oppose this legislation.
In China, the CCP have been using a clunky Social Credit System based on facial recognition to condition people into compliance. Do what the CCP says and life will be relatively easy. Buck the system and you’ll find it very difficult to live.
In the West, Big Tech is saying
“Hold my Beer.”
From Silicon Valley to Pablo Montana
Aman Jabbi is a camera technology entrepreneur with deep expertise in facial recognition systems. He formerly worked in Silicon Valley, California, but after extensive research into how this tech was being deployed to control humans, Aman moved to a small town in Montana.
He is a freedom-lover who spends much of his time now warning and advising people about how to push back against digital control. Aman discusses several relevant topics in this video with Maria Zeee. The topics most relevant to this article are indicated at the following times.
- Introduction (START)
- Facial Recognition Systems (3:30)
- Digital Identity (includes Social Scoring) (25:00)
- Link between Digital Identity and Vaccination Status (29:00)
- New Cybersecurity protocol – Zero Trust (from Implicit Allow to Default Deny) (30:30)
- Security and Privacy is the Trojan Horse (44:30)
Aman, believes that a person’s face will be the method by which their identity will be validated. Others disagree. Their difference of opinion is very small – about the size of a grain of rice.
Under the Skin
This image to the right is from an Aug 2022 email sent to my son-in-law from Suncorp, his bank:
Here is an image of a woman paying with her Walletmor implant.
Yuval Noah Harari, Klaus Schwab’s advisor believes that we are about to enter a new age of digital surveillance – Under the Skin. In this video, he declares that the dystopian Surveillance State Is “Now Possible.”
- (0:17) “Science is not really about truth, it’s about power.”
- (0:27) “Maybe in a couple of decades, when people look back, the things they will remember from the COVID crisis is this is the moment when everything went digital; this was the moment when everything became monitored… we need to be surveyed all the time … and maybe most importantly, this was the moment when surveillance started going under the skin, because really, we haven’t seen anything yet. The big process that’s happening right now … the ability to hack human beings, to understand deeply what’s happening within you; what makes you go.”
- (1:54) “Having the ability to really monitor people under the skin – this is the biggest game changer of all.”
“Dictators always dreamt about completely eliminating privacy, monitoring everybody all the time and knowing everything you do.” (Yuval Noah Harari).
Brzezinski’s vision was truly extraordinary.
We see here from official WEF literature how vaccination will be used as an entry point for Digital Identity.
Harari speaks of biometric sensors, under the skin, that provide data to hack humans. Can you imagine the hacking possibilities afforded by Elon Musk’s neural link? Watch this video beginning with Musk explaining that:
“the future’s going to be weird.” (2:40).
Neural link is truly impressive but its implications are absolutely chilling.
“A good two-way, direct communication system between brains and computers – this is kind of the watershed moment. Once you have a good two-way, no-body has any idea what happens after that.”
(Yuval Noah Harari) (4:45)
Acceleration
The rate of change of the velocity of an object with respect to time. We recognise that these ideas and technologies have been brewing for decades. But as Harari indicated …
… it was the inane COVID response that shifted these into warp speed.
It’s as though there is some sinister future deadline that simply must be met. World leaders have been willing to do the unthinkable since 2020 and many curious philosophers have been searching for the reason why. Is it simply the Agenda 2030 timetable that must be met? Is Climate Change really going to burn the planet up in 12 years? I’ve read and heard from several authors that argue it’s all about money; a LOT of Money.
.
.
.
TO BE CONTINUED