The Seventeen
Sustainable Development Goals
of the UN Agenda 2023
represent Klaus Schwab’s
“Sustainable and Inclusive” future.
They are:
- End poverty in all its forms everywhere
- End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
- Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
- Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
- Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
- Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
- Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
- Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
- Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
- Reduce inequality within and among countries
- Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
- Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
- Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts
- Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
- Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
- Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
- Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the Global Partnership for Sustainable Development
This list of 17 SDGs impacts upon almost every aspect of life on earth. The goals are ambitious, but are they Simple, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Time-based (SMART)? More importantly, are these the best goals to support human flourishing?
ESG scores compel organisations toward SDG compliance as 2030 looms. People are being herded towards a Net-Zero cliff, but is this really sustainable?
Some serious questions remain.
Here are just a few:
1. How does crushing small farmers across many nations lead to food security?
2. If Carbon Dioxide is plant food and crop production increases with higher CO2 levels, why are we trying to reduce CO2?
3. Why is renewable energy neither affordable nor reliable with many people now having to choose between heating and eating?
4. Why are so many whales beaching themselves adjacent to off-shore wind-turbine projects?
5. Why are trans biological men dominating women’s sports?
6. Why does violence and injustice abound where sustainable and inclusive policies are enacted?
Ze future promised by the UN and WEF does not appear to be unfolding very well. How can we be sure that it will really be a good thing for humanity?
If only Scrooge’s third ghost were here to provide us with a glimpse of the future.
Perhaps then we’d all get on board with the program.
Thankfully, a government body exists that is setting the pace in implementing the UN Agenda 2030 SDGs. Here is a progress report from the US state of Hawaii.
This should serve as a useful case study into the merits of adopting the 17 SDGs.
Hawaii is a microcosm of a global sustainable and inclusive future. They were well on their way before 2015, when the UN unveiled its 2030 agenda. From this article we see that:
“The United States, and the world as a whole, is now in a transition to a clean energy future. The State of Hawaii—a leader in this transition since it established the Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative in 2008 with the Energy Department—is well on its path toward achieving the most ambitious clean energy target in the country. After initially setting a goal of 70% clean energy by 2030, Hawaii further upped the ante in 2015 by setting a goal of 100% renewable electricity by 2045.”
In 2019, Lorraine H. Akiba, the former Commissioner, Hawaii Public Utilities Commission and President / CEO, LHA Ventures spruiked about the progress being made. She presented:
Just four years on, what have we learnt? A recent Hawaiian tragedy provides an alternative perspective, exposing a dark side to this renewables journey.
From this Daily Mail article, we discover that Hawaiian Electric focused obsessively on renewable energy while only spending $245,000 on wildfire safety. They recognised the threat of wildfires but waited for years to act. Routine utility work including trimming or removing trees and upgrading, replacing and inspecting equipment was intended to minimise wildfire risk. Their focus on installing renewables meant that little remained for wildfire safety.
This Reuters article claims that the fires started on the night of August 8. At the time of publishing my article, over 100 people had died, over 1,000 were missing and entire communities had been razed to the ground. Many believe the initial fire was sparked by a fallen power-line.
Here is an image, captured at the Maui Bird Conservation Center near Makawao taken at 10:47 pm on Aug 8th.
It appears to show a bright flash in the woods that many believe was caused by a tree falling on a powerline.
Sensors detected a fault in the power grid near Makawao at precisely the same time.
Lahaina is located 35 km west of Makawao.
A very sad aspect of this tragedy flows from this Gateway Pundit article:
“The people of Maul begged for life-saving water from the West Maui stream to be used to fight the fires only to be brushed off.
The Honolulu Star-Advertiser reported Wednesday there was an official request made to divert the water and it was ignored for several hours by Deputy Director M. Kaleo Manuel of the Hawaii Commission on Water Resource Management (CWRM).
The fire was contained at 9 A.M. local time but troubling weather conditions and low reservoir levels led them to make the request for stream water to store as much water as possible for fire control.
The reservoirs needed to be filled by 1 P.M. Instead, Manuel waited until 6 P.M. and the once-contained fire completely exploded.
… the official who delayed the approval is an Obama Foundation “Asia Pacific Leader” and a climate activist …”
This X post gives us an insight into Mr Manuel’s thought process.
During a recent Zoom meeting he stated:
“The commission is responsible…to protect and manage all water resources in the state. …
You know, in essence … Native Hawaiians treated water as one of the earthly manifestations of a god… and so that reverence for a resource and that reciprocity in relationship was something that was really, really important to our worldview and well-being …
So, … we’ve become used to looking at water as something which we use and not necessarily something that we revere as that thing that gives us life, right.”
Conspiracy theories abound regarding plans to transform Hawaii into a bunch of 15-min Smart Cities. I find it difficult to comprehend that leaders would be willing to set Lahaina ablaze to achieve this end. I’ve seen no evidence that woke leaders caused the Lahaina fire, but they sure seemed to be ready to make sure it wasn’t stopped and to benefit from the crisis. It seems a bit like the release of SAR-COV-2 from that Wuhan lab. The fact patterns are very disturbing.
Sasha Latypova (former bio-medical executive) provided facts about recent meetings planning for a massive digital transformation in Hawaii in her substack.
However, this Instagram post provides perhaps, the most damning set of facts:
To rub salt into the wounds of the displaced masses attempting to cope with the tragedy, we hear that:
“insurance companies are already denying insurance claims based on zoning infractions” and predatory property moguls are circling like vultures, seeking for a land-grab.
Hawaii Gov. Josh Green said the state government is considering acquiring land (under eminent domain laws) devastated by wildfires “to protect it for our local people so it’s not stolen by people on the mainland.”
How loverly – you will own nothing and be happy!
But what can you expect from cult leaders? Is anything out of bounds when it comes to saving Gaia from the blight that is humanity? Joe Rogan himself agrees that the climate cult madness must stop:
So, there you have it; a great case study into the application of policies designed to embed SDGs:
6. … sustainable management of water …;
7. … modern energy for all; and
13. … combat climate change
So how is it going so far in Hawaii? Let’s recap. What impact have these SDGs had on humanity, particulary:
3. … Healthy lives and well-being …;
11. … Make … human settlements … safe;
15. … Protect … terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests … and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss; and
16. … Promote peaceful and inclusive societies …, provide access to justice for all.
So, Ghost of Christmas Future, if we continue down this path of pagan cult worship and SDG zealotry, how will Ze Future unfold for us?
I have written previously in several articles that such a dystopian future is fast approaching and those supporting the UN Agenda 2030 are driven by gnostic Climate cult and woke Marxist worldviews. The evidence supporting my position continues to mount.
What we all, like Scrooge, must do immediately is to heed the warning of the Ghost of Christmas future and repent; that is, change our minds, our affections and our directions. If you work for business leaders who supports the UN Agenda 2030 SDGs, the WEF and globalist elites, you need to challenge them with information like this and ask them why they are leading you down a dystopian hell-hole.
Supporters of the UN Agenda 2023 (like Mr. Manuel from Hawaii) are attempting to ensnare the world’s population into pagan religions cult practices that will inevitably result in the massive loss of human life and liberty. This is pure pagan idolatry. The 17 SDGs are designed by global elites to impoverish and imprison the masses through harsh restrictions on fundamental resources, including food and fuel. Why? For Power and Control. The gnostic cult virus mind of the globalist elites views humans as a blight on the environment that must be controlled.
In this article by Desmond Berg: THE UN WANTS TO BE OUR WORLD GOVERNMENT BY 2030 we read:
“The entire “Transforming Our World” document is cast in a stream of consciousness of pious platitudes for a utopian future. … Five of the 17 items pertain to the environment. There are goals for the cities, for women, for the poor, and even for life under the water. Absolutely no sphere of human activity is exempt from control by the UN. …
The one-worlders of the 1950s and early 1960s are now in the UN driver’s seat, and they have made their move. … The UN has assigned itself a time frame for moving forward in its plan for planetary hegemony.
This projected transformation detailing (yet without details) a new world order of environmental responsibility and a significant reduction of poverty and hunger never speaks to the practical dimension of vast manipulations of people by cynical leaders and ignorant bureaucrats who hold their positions through terrorism and bribery. They never discuss incompetence and corruption, twin brothers in the family of venality. The document portrays a sincere world where all those in power want to help humanity despite the daily evidence of the selfishness, corruption, murderous intents, devilish manipulations, thefts, personal immoralities, hatreds, and utter depravity of many governmental leaders in every country in the world, and among the leaders of business as well.
Is not the Agenda for Sustainable Development itself one of those devilish manipulations?”
Today you must decide to stand. Stand for something or you’ll fall for anything. People just like me have been cancelled or even lost their jobs for holding the wrong values. Values like:
- Freedom of speech
- Freedom of religious expression
- The Judaeo-Christian ethic
- The sanctity of life
- Standing against human trafficking and the sexualisation of children
Freedom is not free. It was bought with a price. Just ask the great-grandchildren of the brave soldiers who stormed the beaches in war-time for our freedom.
I will stand for what is right. Will you join me?