UN-Expected

The following critical questions were then raised:

• Have Muller’s writings been dismissed as the ramblings of a madman by UN, WEF and world leaders?
• Or have globalists, instead, believed, embraced and acted upon his audacious goals?
• Have policy decisions, tools and propaganda been deployed to destroy the Judeo-Christian West and install a New World Order based on the occult?

Muller’s ideas and policy suggestions can be grouped by the following list:

1. Climate change;
2. Overpopulation;
3. Elevation of Indigenous knowledge over science and rational thought;
4. Worship of Mother Earth (Gaia);
5. Cosmic Consciousness replacing Judeo-Christian values;
6. Promotion of the decline of the USA (including mass migration, bankrupting the economy and causing continued crises); and
7. The creation of a new world order, with sovereignty being ceded gradually from sovereign nation-states to supranational organisations such as the UN.

If these were to be embraced, what could one expect to see?  More specifically, regarding theme 6., if the Cloward-Piven Strategy was implemented, how would it look?

1. Climate Change

The UN established a research body (UNIPCC) that was tasked not to investigate whether natural causes contributed to the changing climate (which has been changing since the earth was formed).  Rather, it was claimed that the science around Climate Change was “settled” much like that surrounding the COVID shots.

It then insisted that any contrary opinion be censored or challenged on social media, much like this label applied to any video criticising the established narrative.

This is a prime example of the Censorship Industrial Complex (CIC) – to be discussed in a future article.

The documentary: Climate the Movie sets the record straight.

2. Overpopulation

Two reports by the Club of Rome on the impact of the population growth on Mother Earth: Limits to Growth (1972) and The First Global Revolution (1991) have undoubtedly influenced Muller’s “Ideas”.  The latter document includes the quote (pg 145):

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. … All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”

First Global Revolution (Pg 145)

This has obviously inspired many of Muller’s views on humanity including the belief that man is the dominant blight upon the earth.

In the light of this, numerous scandals and conspiracy theories regarding eugenics, abortion and forced sterilisation abound.  None of these are unfounded.  As written in QED:

In 1948, in an article titled UNESCO: Its Purpose and its Philosophy, Sir Julian Huxley, the President of the UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) showed how much Malthusianism had invaded the ranks of UN leaders, when he explained that:

“Thus, even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy of controlled human breeding will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much [that] is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”

Julian Huxley

The UN is currently tackling the rising population rate on several fronts, but primarily through their Sustainable Development Goals.  From this UN report, we see that a decline in fertility rates, a reduction in resource usage and a focus on climate change are all focus areas for the perceived population problem.

So, what is the end result of the UN’s influence over the world population these past 75 years?

To their chagrin, the UN’s WHO was unable to force high COVID shot rates in poor nations such as Africa.

Could Australia’s low birth rate also be impacted by some type of pharmacological intervention that commenced in mid-2021? 

We all know that correlation is not causation, but all over the world and at the same time?  Funny that.

3. Indigenous Knowledge

The UNDRIP was then instrumental in promoting the individual and collective rights of indigenous peoples, including their ownership rights to cultural and ceremonial expression, identity, language, employment, health, education, and other issues. 

Australia Day is under annual attack and “Welcome to Country” ceremonies continuing unabated. What nation welcomes it’s own people to every meeting held?

Did you know that there was a Native Title Claim covering the entire QLD Sunshine Coast?  Neither did I.

During the 19 Jun 2024 Senate Estimates hearing, Senator Malcolm Roberts quizzed Mr. Fletcher of AHPRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency) about funding for their “Cultural Safety Strategy.”  From Senator Roberts’ web site: “I asked the representative of AHPRA about the directive that is written into the Cultural Safety Strategy which …

This approach mirrors the strategy that was employed during the Voice Referendum, which was decisively rejected by the Australian public as being divisive.”

Although the power-grabbing Voice language failed to be written into the Australian constitution (via the failed Voice referendum 2023), similar efforts are succeeding in Canada, New Zealand and to a smaller degree in the US.  Where’s this all coming from?  Simple!

The UN has declared two decades of Indigenous Peoples 1995-2004 and 2022-2032 to “promote non-discrimination and inclusion of indigenous peoples in processes at all levels.”  See the section on Decolonisation within the article Proportional for more details.

4. Worship of Mother Earth (Gaia);

The United Nations General Assembly proclaimed 22 April as International Mother Earth Day through a resolution adopted in 2009. This UN site claims that:

“Mother Earth is clearly urging a call to action – a need to shift to a more sustainable economy that works for both people and the planet. Protecting the planet is everyone’s responsibility.”

5. Cosmic Consciousness replacing Judeo-Christian values

The UN supports a Communist approach to ordering the world’s economies.

The February 2022 UN article “Population growth, environmental degradation and climate change” unites several “noble” globalist ideals and proposes a militant uprising among workers to seize the means of production (a widely recognised reference to one of the central tenets of Communism, as proposed by Karl Marx).

At its 66th plenary meeting on April 18, 2023, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the resolution “Promoting the Social and Solidarity Economy for Sustainable Development” (A/77/L.60).

For those who don’t speak Spanish, this video explains it all.  Marx would be thrilled.

From his Integral Philosophy “Aurobindo’s work suggests that the evolution of consciousness would eventually lead to the manifestation of Cosmic Consciousness, a state where the individual realizes their oneness with the entire cosmos … the Pinnacle of Evolution. …

Achieving Cosmic Consciousness has profound implications [including]:

Transformation of human nature: This consciousness would bring about a transformation of human nature, leading to a more enlightened, peaceful, and compassionate society. …

With the rise of Cosmic Consciousness, Aurobindo anticipated a new world order based on spiritual principles, where unity and collaboration would replace conflict and division.  He believed that this change would be gradual, but inevitable as more individuals awakened to this higher state of being.”

A modern society can only be overcome if / when the dominant set of values (hegemony), taught through family, religions and education is toppled.

So, what are some of the values that lie behind “evolved” Cosmic Consciousness? Earth Restorative Justice, Climate Change, peace, social justice and healing for the Earth and all living beings are values common to New Age thought and religious unity movements globally.

Muller expressed many such values in his “Ideas” books and went on to applaud the efforts of groups such as the United Religions Organization, a registered charity with consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council.  This grass-roots group focuses its activities on the above list of values.  They may sound innocent enough to the untrained ear, but how does the evolving set of UN-sponsored global religious values express itself in society?

The UN supports replacing the nuclear family with other forms of love.

Derided as misogynistic and outdated through pejoratives such as “the patriarchy” and “hetero-normativity,” the nuclear family (father, mother and children), the most fundamental structure of Judeo-Christian society, is under constant attack.

Do you realise that although SDG 5 is supposed to support Females, the letter F will never appear in the gender alphabet list?

This article (written by the UN Under-Secretary-General and Executive Director of UN-Women) shows the Mott and Bailey in action.

Here is another.

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, originating in academia as Critical Theory and now being driven through business and society top-down, further reinforce this attack against the hegemonic values set.  It is no wonder that the left cannot define what a woman is.

If you read about Marcuse in Sustainable, you’ll recall that:

Marcuse was also fearful of overpopulation when there were only 3 Billion people on the earth in 1950.

However, it’s the work of Foucault that provides the sting in SDG 5 and in fact, all of DEI (which informs the “S” in ESG).  In Q’d Up we learnt that the Q in LGBTQIA+ is not a destination, but rather a political position.  “Queer is by definition whatever is at odds with the normal, the legitimate, the dominant.”

Recently, the UN supported the decriminalisation of under-age sex.  The language also seemed to support paedophilia, but this was denied by the UN when questioned further.  Where does it end?

There is a straight line from the sexual perversions of Marcuse and Foucault to SDG 5.  For more information, please refer to Q’d Up.

In 1963, 45 Goals for the Communist usurpation of the US were read into the Congressional record.  Here are just a few of these:

11.  Promote the UN as the only hope for mankind.  If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.

26.  Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

40.  Discredit the family as an institution.  Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

These are writ large within the SDGs, DEI and ESG. But could they be summarised in a more appropriate image?  Perhaps this tapestry, prominently displayed at the 2024 WEF meeting where SDGs were being discussed?

The UN supports global migration as a means of Equity or Restorative Justice.

The UN asserts that global migration is a human right.  The UN, through its International Organization for Migration (IOM), has launched its Global Annual Appeal for 2024.

The UN requested USD 7.9 billion to “support its operations and help create a system that realizes migration’s promise as a force for good throughout the world”.

The UN supports antisemitism and a decolonisation agenda.

The article Victims, Families of Oct. 7 Hamas Terrorist Attacks Sue UNRWA for $1 Billion summarises some of the many atrocities perpetrated against Jews on Oct 7 2023 enabled by the UN. “At least 12 UNRWA staffers took part in the mass slaughter of innocent Jews.

The Times of Israel reports:

It said UNRWA, which coordinates nearly all aid to Gaza, let Hamas use its facilities for weapons storage, allowed tunnels and command centers to be built under its sites, and funneled cash into the terror group’s coffers by insisting on paying employees in US dollars.

‘Hamas did not carry out these atrocities without assistance,’ the lawsuit said. ‘Defendants were warned repeatedly that their policies were directly providing assistance to Hamas,’ it asserted. ‘In the face of those warnings, Defendants continued those very policies.’”

Biden Regime Reversed Trump Policy and Sent Nearly $1 Billion to UNRWA in Gaza Since 2021

These damning allegations have forced the hand of some reluctant politicians.

U.S. Halts Funding to UN Agency Following Allegations of Employee Involvement in Oct 7 Israel Massacre

“The U.S. State Department’s move comes in the wake of UNRWA’s admission and subsequent dismissal of several staff members.”

Yet others still remain defiant.

The UN flew its flag at half mast mourning the death of the Iranian President – the Butcher of Baghdad. Nice.

Promotion of the decline of the USA

From the Dr Robert Malone article: Population Control and the American Way of Life, we read:

“The DATA indicate that what they really are striving for is a New World Order, whereby the UN becomes the dominant force of the world, with nation states nestled under their organizational structure. One in which out migration combined with regional population control via government-enabled birth control (via both pharmaceuticals and deployed propaganda) is designed to augment that process of enabling populations born in economically disadvantaged regions to gain control of more economically advanced nations and infrastructure while destroying the cultures and politico/economic structures which have historically enabled the economic development of these more advanced regions.”

In the Epoch Times documentary Weapons of Mass Migration, it is apparent that the UN is facilitating the trafficking of people from South American nations through the US southern border, working hand in hand with the drug (now human trafficking) cartels.

No UN representative was willing to speak with the Epoch Times reporters.

Bankrupting the Economy

The current US Administration is growing its national debt by $1T dollars every 100 days. 

The interest due on the $34T + debt is already over $1T annually.  This is unsustainable.  What could fix a financial system that collapses under its own debt?  Perhaps a “Great Reset” using global digital currency?

Continued Crises

Let’s begin with the tyrannical government response to COVID: forced lockdowns, masking, mandated “vaccines” that were neither safe nor effective, crushing of small business while large multinationals increased their wealth.

These then led to broken supply chains, millions of the world’s poorest flung back into poverty, inflation, doubling of fuel prices, food insecurity, interest rate rises, mortgage stress, lack of rental accommodation, homelessness, crime, increases in drug deaths, increases in suicide, elevated and sustained excess death rates with no interest in finding the root cause, unchecked immigration and potential nuclear war with Russia – just to name a few.  Need I continue?

The creation of a new world order, with sovereignty being ceded gradually from sovereign nation-states to supranational organisations such as the UN.

The UN and its acolytes including the WEF and EU are very clear about the purpose and role of programs such as Sustainability, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. 

The UN 17 Sustainable Development Goals are way behind where they should be.  When announcing his SDG rescue plan, UN Secretary-General António Guterres wrote: 

“Halfway to the deadline for the 2030 Agenda, we are leaving more than half the world behind.  We have stalled or gone into reverse on more than 30 percent of the SDGs. … Unless we act now, the 2030 Agenda will become an epitaph for a world that might have been.’

During the SDG Summit at UN Headquarters in New York on 18-19 September, Guterres addressed member state representatives directly.  However, the UN’s World Health Organisation is hoping to deliver covertly, what is being resisted in the open.  This is described in more detail at the end of Black Swan and in a recent Dr. Malone substack article entitled: Pandemics as a Catalyst for a New World Order.

Here is an excerpt:

“By globally synchronizing the public health response across the United Nations member states, new powers were granted to the UN and its organizations at the cost of national sovereignty. These universally applied regulations and multilateral agreements have given birth to an enlarged, globalized administrative state.

Although this power grab has been percolating for many decades, the COVID crisis acted as an accelerant to synergize international agreements that advance the UN as a world government.

Its various agreements and goals seek to centrally dictate the world’s economy, migration, “reproductive health”, monetary systems, digital IDs, environment, agriculture, wages, climate modifications, one world health, and other related globalist programs.

To be clear, these are the goals of an organization seeking a globalized command economy, not an organization focused on world peace, ending wars or human rights!

This UN aims to regulate every dimension of our personal and national lives. It is working to reduce and eliminate national sovereignty across the world, and thereby to decrease our diversity, our traditions, our religions and our national identities.

The UN has partnerships and strategic agreements with member nations, as well as other globalist organizations such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Bank, CEPI, GAVI, The World Trade Organization, The European Union and the World Economic Forum, known as the WEF.”

Not one to let a crisis go to waste, the UN plans to piggy-back off the “success” of the COVID lockdowns to promote climate lockdowns. At this point, one would expect a rational leader to take stock of the situation and push for improvements to agricultural productivity, to reduce poverty and human suffering.  Well, like any good Marxist, Guterres dismisses his failures and clamours for even more centralised control.

The WHO is working feverishly with complicit government leaders (almost every single one of them) to accumulate pandemic powers which will crush national sovereignty.  With expanded control over every person, animal and plant (via One Health) , they will be able to inflict even more pain upon the masses in the search for the utopian dream.  Should we be concerned?

I trust that over the past three articles, the following argument has been made and defended with sufficient evidence:

• The root cause of this malady can be found in Robert Muller’s 2000 Ideas for a Better World.
• The United Nations have embraced Muller’s Ideas and converted them into tyrannical tools.
• The United Nations is a religious cult.

How could this have happened? Are we blind, apathetic or complicit?

TO BE CONTINUED