…or be moved.
The Climate Change cult has been spectacularly successful in driving a whole raft of legislation and manipulating markets to promote outrageously expensive, dangerous and environmentally ugly technologies.
Politicians (The Australian Labour Party) have promised cheap renewable energy. What have they delivered? Very expensive energy via a progressively unreliable grid. How did we get here?
After successive fear campaigns regarding acid rain and then later, the ozone layer, the masses remained uninterested until the appropriate narrative was finally discovered. Global Warming, Global Cooling, Climate Change. But, for those who care to read, we know that this too is a pretext, albeit a very useful one, for control. As we saw from the folks that gave us Limits to Growth (The Club of Rome):
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. In their totality and in their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which demands the solidarity of all peoples. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap about which we have already warned, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome.
The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
The First Global Revolution (1991)
Films like Avatar portray human beings as a blight upon the earth; parasites that must be expelled and where possible, exterminated.
Who is Man?
It is claimed that humans simply use too many of the earth’s resources and so must be put in their place, both in terms of importance and physical location. The Overton window must be moved dramatically to convince humans that they (voluntarily, if possible) need to get out of nature’s way.
Driving from the top-down, Sustainable Development Goals, ESG and specifically Net Zero Carbon have been used as cudgels to coerce CEOs into limiting fossil fuel use and promoting the “degrowth” agenda (see Retrograde). Now bubbling from the bottom-up, DEI and climate hysteria are being tactically deployed by women and children to replace rational thought with raw emotion. Sadly, they are but pawns in the information war.
Who can forget the “how dare you” rebuke from Greta Thunberg at the 2019 Climate Action Summit.
Climate change found its new champion, no doubt coached by an opportunistic PR guru to engage hearts and minds; to move us.
Moving people emotionally plays an important role in the global PSYOP which is Climate hysteria. While ever private property rights are retained, humans may continue to reject the hypocritical chiding of elites, swanning about in private jets, living in huge mansions, demanding the average person reduce their carbon footprint and eat crickets. Their hypocrisy is writ large. However, another more sinister form of movement is what the elites truly desire.
Our favourite Bond villain, Klaus Schwab is attempting to nurture a new generation of compliant ones.
But how could they possibly convince current property owners to part with their family home? Or the next generation to abandon the dream of home-ownership? Could Gen Z be convinced to forgo their inheritance for the good of Mother Nature? That is a massive shift in thinking and 2030 is not far off. However, as I wrote in UN-Reasoning: “luxury beliefs like Climate Change fall off the charts when families can’t feed their kids.”
To what lengths will they go?
We saw in Ze Future how the tragedy of the Lahaina fire could potentially be used to seize land through eminent domain laws. But surely, a global fire sale is too messy. There must be a cleaner, simpler way to separate people from their property. Perhaps a mechanism that people may even embrace?
Private ownership is at risk. We know this from the articles City Slickers and Digi-Tot. Evidence for elites wanting to move people into 15-minute Smart Cities hides in plain sight.
Yes, the elites’ desire is there, but can it be enforced?
Over the past four years I’ve researched and written about several key strategies begin employed by global elites to control the world’s population. Some of these include:
- The world’s draconian COVID response championed by the UN World Health Organization (WHO)
- Record global migration levels championed by the UN International Organization for Immigration (IOM)
- Elevating Indigenous Peoples’ rights, their “ways of knowing” above logic and reason and the “decolonisation” push championed by the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)
- The promotion of climate hysteria including Net Zero Carbon championed by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (UNIPCC)
- The orchestration of a New World Order, including SDGs, ESG, DEI and Public-Private Partnerships championed by a cabal of globalist elites including the UN and WEF
At the end of this article, I will share a diagram that describes a dark web of control, with the help of the following missing piece …
I recently discovered a video produced by Kate Mason. Her Substack includes articles that summarise the extensive research she’s done into how governments (including Australia) are planning, with legislation already in place, to separate people from their property. It is based on the UN Disaster Risk Recovery Framework (2015-2030) that gave us “Build Back Better.”
Mason begins the video with the following:
“Many Australians are completely oblivious to the fact that the government is unrolling a huge amount of government plans which discuss things such as disaster adaption, managed retreat, which is removing people from their property and privatised infrastructure that has enormous implications for wealth and asset transfer. The Australian Government is transforming private property ownership all under a catastrophic Climate Modelling landscape.
Whatever country is your home, disaster adaption is a global agenda channelled down through the United Nations. If your country signed the Sendai [Disaster Risk Reduction aka Build Back Better] Framework 2015-2030, your country is bound to create climate adaption plans. The adaption plans are manufactured through the United Nations Environment Programme. These plans have serious implications for private property ownership, as well as for people to live where they wish in their own country. Infrastructure will be privatised, and assets will incrementally be owned by corporate entities.”
“Conspiracy Theory” is what bureaucrats and the media will cry! Yet, how did Mason come to such conclusions?
She was inspired to conduct some research into this legislation in NSW and Australia after listening to a Reality Check radio program in Jan 2024.
In it, a woman spoke about how the NZ government was dealing with a proposed managed retreat from homes on NZ’s Kapiti Coast.
An important point to note here is that bureaucrats use the “Delphi method” to obtain what they pretend to be genuine feedback in these community consultation meetings. The video includes two minutes of actual footage from such a meeting (from 2:45).
At the 3:55 min mark, you’ll see the lady speaking say to the man approaching her “are you trying to shut me down”? The man? Former NZ Prime Minister Jim Bolger, tasked with leading the community consultation process. The only reason there were so many informed people at the meeting was that someone had learnt of what was happening beforehand and organised a letter-box drop, drawing a large group of engaged community members.
Back to Mason’s video.
2:18 “I was concerned enough at the time to look into Australia as all plans are global and it’s only a matter of time. Distressingly, I found extensive government and private body papers detailing uninsurable homes, housing certificates detailing climate risk, legislation allowing the government to take land, based on climate change modelling and plans afoot for managed retreat and disaster adaption. Since that time, government has put its foot on the pedal and a flurry of papers have been released from Federal, State and Local.”
Mason has read hundreds of pages of legislation and has pulled out the most relevant bits to discuss. As I’ve also written about in the past, Mason agrees that all of this anti-human rhetoric begins with globalist elites, often via the UN.
I’d suggest that you watch Mason’s entire video. If you can’t, some chapter headings with time stamps are provided below.
3:30 Sydney’s stacked and packed mini-cities are going up all around us. “Any feedback could fall on deaf ears. The government doesn’t have to act on any complaints.”
8:15 Local councils are now developing adaption plans, based on the most extreme climate modelling scenario available (RCP8.5)
“At today’s CO2 concentration in the atmosphere of approximately 420 parts per million, additional amounts of CO2 have little ability to absorb heat and therefore is now a weak greenhouse gas. At higher concentrations in the future, the ability of future increases to warm the planet will be even smaller.
This also means that the common assumption that carbon dioxide is ‘the main driver of climate change’ is scientifically false. In short, more carbon dioxide cannot cause catastrophic global warming or more extreme weather. Neither can greenhouse gases of methane or nitrous oxide, the levels of which are so small that they are irrelevant to climate.”
Professor Richard Lindzen
15:00 Multiple natural hazard risks are compounded to achieve an overall risk score, based on the most catastrophic scenario.
16:48 The community is the last to be engaged with and is the most marginalised.
18:00 Mandated mitigation measures and home insurance premiums will lead to people falling out of the property market. Population Growth is a trigger for Adaptation Pathway.
19:00 New legislation allows for pre-emptive (based on modelling) disaster measures to be used. Any emergency (at the discretion of the Minister) can be labelled a “disaster.”
22:00 Declaration of a Disaster Prevention Area (again, based on modelling) gives the NSW Reconstruction Authority powers to acquire property without a home-owner’s permission and do with it whatever they want.
22:50 State Disaster Mitigation Plan describes NSW as a “land of threats.” [Note the imagery. It is coloured to look quite threatening. There’s not much white space on the map, denoting a lack of safe places to live, especially near the coast. Is that really the case?]
24:30 A multi-hazard risk approach is used, based on the most catastrophic modelling available. Population growth is blamed for the increasing risk. Climate risk overlays over regions and houses will cause insurance premiums to rise sharply. [Have you noticed the recent sharp rise in Home Insurance Premiums?]
Storms Ahead?
This article will help to compare claims: Climate Change is Increasing the Strength and Frequency of Hurricanes?
Below are some graphs of severe weather events in the Northern Hemisphere (where accurate records have been kept for the past 50 years).
“So here we are, confronted with policies that destroy western economies, impoverish the working middle class, condemn billions of the world’s poorest to continued poverty and increased starvation, leave our children despairing over the alleged absence of a future, and will enrich the enemies of the West who are enjoying the spectacle of our suicide march, a march that the energy sector cowardly accepts, being too lazy to exert the modest effort needed to check what is being claimed. As Voltaire once noted, ‘Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.‘
Hopefully, we will awaken from this nightmare before it is too late.”
Professor Richard Lindzen
Back to Kate Mason’s video
26:20 12% of households already cannot afford home insurance.
27:50 “We will continue to engage with the community.” [WHO KNEW ABOUT ANY OF THIS AT ALL?]
30:30 17 of 20 of the Local Government Areas are involved with the six Mega-city regional areas that the Government established several years ago.
32:20 Managed relocation is defined as the permanent and purposeful movement of people and existing homes and infrastructure exposed to existing or anticipated effects of natural hazards.
33:30 Coastal Management Plans. At this stage Mason encourages all of us to get involved with our local plans. I decided to stop the video and do some research. I found detailed plans and maps of the Sunshine Coast.
The Sunshine Coast is relatively risk-free IMO. I’ve lived here for 17 years. In that time, we’ve had heavy rains often, but never any flooding on the coast except for some low-lying areas near the Maroochy River a couple of times. There was one hurricane where a few homes had trees felled in my suburb. No bushfires.
Yet this chart (pg 32) indicates that land purchase / swap / relocation is relevant / feasible, but not a priority (yet).
Perhaps they are waiting for a “George Floyd” type of disaster event to turn the Green column to Blue.
Storm Tide Inundation (year 2100) and erosion modelling.
This interactive map of the Sunshine Coast displays a frightening picture of coastal Storm Tide Inundation. This is based in the year 2100 and RCP8.5.
But if we drill down, the image is not so bad. This map (next to a Google Maps version which labels the suburbs and natural features) shows flooding of low-lying areas (e.g golf course) and inundation of some houses along waterways. I think much of the blame for this needs to be placed at the feet of local councils who are permitting development in flood zones.
35:30 Blackrock’s CEO Larry Fink discusses Global Infrastructure Partners. Rather than being Government-owned, future infrastructure is moving towards a public-private partnership [where have we heard that before? WEF!]
41:20 National Adaption Plan. Climate adaption is the process of adjusting to actual or expected climate change and its effects. Documentation states that Australia needs to make adaption mainstream. Everything will be governed through a risk lens, using the most catastrophic climate modelling (RCP8.5).
43:00 In some circumstances, expected climate impacts may be so significant that communities consider planned retreat. [Documents also use the terms “planned or managed relocation”] “This is a very sensitive issue, and any such action would require deep consultation with communities to ensure human mobility is supported with dignity.” If you’ve not yet done so, now would be a good time to watch the NZ Kapiti Coast community consultation video.
44:0 I’ve outlined serious, transformative plans with enormous implication for private ownership of property and for infrastructure to be put in private bodies’ hands. Has your state member of parliament brought this up to you? Has your minister told you that the government now has the capacity to take your land based on climate change modelling?
45:40 In order to obtain or afford home insurance, home owners will need to comply with expensive mitigation strategies.
46:30 Coastal properties at highest climate risk could fall in value in 18 months
47:00 Infrastructure Australia – A Pathway to Infrastructure Resilience. Nature is now seen as Infrastructure. Overlay of ownership over land and water which is currently see as “the commons.”
47:40 Moving from “the environment is priceless” to “the environment has a price on it.” Recognise the value of blue (waterways) and green (land) infrastructure as an asset class. The Nature Repair Act and the Nature Repair Market Scheme. Nature – previously regarded as “the commons” will go into private ownership.
49:00 As people are moved out of private land due to climate relocation, this land can be bought (private ownership) and rewilded. Who knows, perhaps they will even figure out how to make those relocated pay for rewilding the land and for the right to breathe the oxygen being provided by it?
Here are some documents I found for Australia, QLD and NSW, simply by Ducking words like Climate Risk, Disaster adaption and managed retreat.
- National Climate Resilience and Adaptation Strategy
- Managed Retreat Explainer
- Queensland Climate Adaptation Strategy 2017–2030
- Queensland Strategy for Disaster Resilience 2022–2027
- NSW State Disaster Mitigation Plan
- NSW Disaster Adaptation Plan Guidelines
Cui Bono (Who Benefits)?
“The term “Disaster Capitalism,” coined and developed by progressive journalist Naomi Klein in her seminal 2007 work “The Shock Doctrine,” refers to the phenomenon where corporations, governments, and financial institutions exploit crises, such as natural disasters, wars, or economic downturns, to further their own interests and profits. In some cases, these events are naturally occurring; in others, they are intentionally created or may involve a combination of both natural and artificial causes. During the first two years of the COVIDcrisis, many speculated that this series of events was another example of Disaster Capitalism in progress. In retrospect, it is hard to deny that the ensuing cascade of events, documented lies, apparently intentional mismanagement, and massive upward wealth transfer represented a classic case of “Disaster Capitalism” as defined by Klein.”
Be alert, not alarmed.
Knowledge is useful, as long as it can be shared. Get involved in the political process. Stand up for what’s right, but don’t fear (if you trust in God). Otherwise, you have every right to fear.
As mentioned early in this document, I now have the missing pieces needed to finish the following causal map. Vicious circles reinforce programs that systematically remove property rights, impoverish the middle class and lead to a society of serfs living in rented, high-density quarters, entrapped as in a digital gulag.
Please spend a few minutes following the arrows and see if you don’t agree with my assessment of current events. Then, just let it sink in.
This would all be very difficult to comprehend and live with, unless you knew the answers to the following questions:
Who owns it all anyway?
Who is Man?
In terms of physical location, it is God who has established when and where man should live. Please refer to Space-Time for more on this.
In terms of importance, man is made in God’s own image and is the pinnacle of His creation. Although we have all fallen, we have a saviour. Simply repent and believe in Him. Jesus, who came to earth in the likeness of man, paid the ultimate sacrifice.
“What is man that You take thought of him,
And the son of man that You care for him?
Yet You have made him a little lower than God,
And You crown him with glory and majesty!
You make him to rule over the works of Your hands;
You have put all things under his feet.”
Psalm 8:4-6
Jesus now sits at the right hand of God in heaven. Yes, there is now a man in heaven. They may try to move man now, but when He returns to reign upon the earth for a thousand years, his church will rule with Him.
